The likes of the Daily Mail sickeningly used clips of the video in the name of news.
Those don’t only include no-name video posters. To be clear, the YouTube links we clicked on are re-uploads of the primary source video from the event, not any allegedly legitimate “news” coverage that’s been uploaded in response to it, much of it coming from chancers who are essentially just hoping to make a little click-money from people browsing for more information. One of them is even used to promote other videos - gaming-related as it happens. Randomly browsing on the most basic of searches in YouTube at around 9am Eastern, we found a number of copies of the shooting incident - the same ones posted as live streams on Facebook - and reported all of them.Īs of writing, three of the first four we clicked on are still up. The turnaround time of “as soon as we become aware” isn’t quite as fast as you might think. “As with any major tragedy, we will work cooperatively with the authorities.” Shocking, violent and graphic content has no place on our platforms, and is removed as soon as we become aware of it,” said a spokesperson in an email to TechCrunch. “Our hearts go out to the victims of this terrible tragedy. YouTube issued a statement several hours ago condemning the snuff videos, adding that it is removing them as soon as they are made aware: Yet nearly 12 hours later, you can still find multiple copies of the shooting videos on YouTube and Twitter, with some being used to promote other things. Some of that - such as the Facebook and Twitter accounts of the perpetrator - have been deleted. This is a tragedy that doesn’t deserve a snappy lede, but it is one that needs to be highlighted because tech companies should be held to account.Įarlier today there was a horrendous mass mosque shooting in New Zealand that killed 49 people - and because this is 2019, social media was used by the apparent murderers to plan, announce, broadcast and virally resonate what they did.
0 kommentar(er)
